Business objective
Preserve essential workflows while reducing avoidable complexity and improving reporting and adoption.
ERP MODERNIZATION · MICROSOFT DYNAMICS · BUSINESS SYSTEMS
ERP Modernization & Migration Lab
A hands-on enterprise modernization initiative demonstrating the assessment and migration of a legacy Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2018 environment to Dynamics 365 Business Central, including C/AL analysis, AL extension development, data migration, integrations, testing, deployment, analytics and AI-enabled modernization.
My role
Active lab and migration design. The roadmap below describes the method; it does not imply every stage is complete.
Executive overview
The lab examines how NAV 2018 processes, custom objects, integrations, and historical data can be assessed before choosing a Business Central target. The business aim is continuity and clearer information; the technical aim is supportable extensions, interfaces, data, and operations. Work proceeds through discovery, disposition, migration design, validation, and cutover planning.
Preserve essential workflows while reducing avoidable complexity and improving reporting and adoption.
A Business Central architecture with justified AL extensions, governed data movement, supported integrations, security, and analytics.
Legacy environment
The lab assessment covers the NAV client and Role Center, representative workflows, C/SIDE objects, C/AL logic, and SQL Server data context. Verified screenshots and selected sanitized examples will join this section as the work progresses.
LAB IMPLEMENTATION — NAV 2018 lab context. Detailed public media is pending verification and sanitization.
Migration challenge
A NAV migration may need to address aging technology, technical debt, customizations, integrations, historical data, reporting and operational dependencies, security, infrastructure, and migration risk. These are assessment categories, not claims about a named customer environment.
Current-state assessment
MIGRATION DESIGN — assessment dimensions; findings will be published only when supported by lab evidence.
Fit / gap and disposition
Preserve a needed business capability.
Use standard Business Central functionality.
Improve the workflow for the target platform.
Implement justified behavior as an AL extension.
Remove obsolete behavior and maintenance burden.
Connect the capability through a supported interface.
MIGRATION DESIGN — disposition options, not completed decisions for a client system.
Enterprise migration pipeline
NAV 2018 · C/SIDE · C/AL
Processes, objects, dependencies
Standard fit and disposition
Map, cleanse, stage, validate
C/AL analysis → AL extensions
APIs and external systems
SIT → UAT → rehearsal
Readiness, contingency, support
Dynamics 365 Business Central
Power BI + responsible AI
MIGRATION DESIGN — stages describe the intended sequence. Lab evidence and outcomes are labeled separately.
Target architecture
The target design evaluates Business Central, AL extensions, APIs and external systems, migrated data, role-based security, Power BI, and the operational architecture needed to support change. A verified architecture diagram will be added as an artifact.
Standard process fit and secured operations
Justified AL behavior developed in VS Code
Supported APIs, migration and reconciliation
Power BI and governed decision support
MIGRATION DESIGN — conceptual layers, not a claim that every service is deployed.
C/AL → AL modernization
Legacy
Inspect objects, dependencies and the business purpose behind customization.
Modern
Prefer standard behavior; design an extension only where a justified gap remains.
MIGRATION DESIGN — representative method; no completed extension code is implied.
Data migration
Source analysis → mapping → cleansing → staging → migration → validation → reconciliation → rehearsal → final migration. Future sanitized mappings and reconciliation examples can be added to the artifact collection.
Integration modernization
Inventory interfaces and evaluate supported APIs for external systems, EDI, barcode and mobile patterns where relevant. Each integration requires its own scope, security review, test plan, and evidence before it is described as implemented.
Testing and validation
The validation plan spans technical and unit tests, system integration testing (SIT), user acceptance testing (UAT), migration validation, data reconciliation, defect management, sign-off and migration rehearsal.
Cutover and hypercare
Production readiness, a cutover checklist, contingency and rollback planning, training, support ownership, stabilization and hypercare form the release plan. Go-live outcomes are not claimed at this lab stage.
Hands-on technologies
Microsoft Cloud/Azure is considered where applicable; inclusion here does not assert a deployed Azure service.
Power BI and decision intelligence
A modern data foundation can support financial and operational analytics, FP&A, Power BI dashboards and decision intelligence. The existing Power BI case study provides a separate analytics example.
AI and automation
Opportunities include analysis and documentation assistance, migration intelligence, anomaly identification, workflow automation and decision support. These are future opportunities to evaluate, not production AI integrations.
MIGRATION DESIGN — opportunity areas, subject to human review, security and validation.
NAV 2018 before / Business Central after
Each comparison row is reserved for equivalent, sanitized evidence from the same representative workflow. Until both sides are verified, the paired framework shows what will be compared.
NAV 2018 — BEFORENAV 2018 client and Role Center
BUSINESS CENTRAL — AFTEREquivalent Business Central Role Center
NAV 2018 — BEFORERepresentative NAV workflow and data
BUSINESS CENTRAL — AFTERThe same process and representative data in BC
NAV 2018 — BEFOREC/SIDE object and selected C/AL
BUSINESS CENTRAL — AFTERReviewed AL extension approach in VS Code
NAV 2018 — BEFOREExisting interface and report dependency
BUSINESS CENTRAL — AFTERSupported API and reporting design
SIMULATED ENTERPRISE SCENARIO may be used for a representative business process and will be labeled when published.
Project artifacts
The collection is prepared for sanitized screenshots, short videos, architecture diagrams, fit-gap and migration matrices, data mappings, reconciliation examples, test plans, project plans and cutover artifacts.
No public migration artifacts are published yet. The roadmap and comparison above describe the work and its evidence requirements.
Apply this capability
Explore the Nexys365 consulting approach to assessment, migration planning, implementation and adoption.